Highlights of Past Issues
We are pleased to share with you highlights
from past issues of New York Archives magazine, including
one feature article in its entirety from nearly every issue. New
York Archives is a benefit of membership in the Archives Partnership
Trust.
Become a Member of the Archives Partnership
Trust to receive New York Archives and other benefits!
Winter 2002, Volume 1, Number 3
Let the Records Show:
The Dutch in Early New York - Martha Dickinson Shattuck
A government hand in everything from baking bread to religious
freedom
Saving An American Treasure - Martha Dickinson Shattuck
12,000 Dutch colonial records are painstakingly preserved
The Half Moon Sails Again - Martha Dickinson Shattuck
A working replica of Henry Hudson's ship offers students and visitors
a unique educational experience
The Dutch Touch
- Peter G. Rose
Dutch influences on American cuisine
Re-Examining Slavery in New York
- A.J. Williams-Myers
Notable and not-so-notable New Yorkers owned and traded enslaved
Africans
Speaking with the Dead: The Fox Sisters - Jeanne Mackin
Queen Victoria, Mary Todd Lincoln, and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
were believers in the alleged spiritual powers of three Rochester
sisters
Country Tears, City Water: The Ashokan Reservoir - Sylvia
Rozzelle
Towns disappear to supply drinking water for New York City
Oscar Garcia Rivera,
Political Pioneer - Felix V. Matos Rodriguez
The origins of Puerto Rican politics in New York City
Featured Article:
Re-examining Slavery
in New York - A.J. Williams-Myers
The South was not the only area of the United States complicit
in slavery. Two hundred years before the Civil War, the North,
particularly New York, was also a willing participant in the buying,
selling, and enslavement of Africans during slavery's most active
era (late 1600s through 1700s). African labor contributed not
only to the enormous wealth New York State had accumulated at
the start of the Revolutionary War, but also to the prosperity
that New York merchants and the landed aristocracy enjoyed from
business, including slaving. Some of the state's most reputable
and politically influential citizens--the Rensselaers, Philipses,
Schuylers, Beekmans, Livingstons, and van Cortlands--owned slaves.
These families, possessing huge manor lands, benefited from slave
labor for generations--their own and their slaves'.
Under both Dutch (ca. 1609-1664) and English (1664-1776) rule,
and even into the early decades of American independence (1783-1808),
wealthy New York gentry participated in all aspects of the slavery
spectrum: from the Atlantic shipping trade of transporting Africans
for future enslavement, to buying and selling slaves, to owning
slaves on family land in New York. The Frederick Philipse family
of Westchester and New York City, for example, ran ships directly
to coastal Africa and the island of Madagascar. A story has it
that one of those ships attempted to avoid import duties by disembarking
a number of Africans at Rye, New York and then marching them overland
to the family's upper mill at Tarrytown.
Not every free New Yorker owned slaves, but those that did held,
on average, between one and three (see tables, based on 1790 Census
figures, showing a comparison of selected New York and South Carolina
counties and the percentages of white slaveholding families).
Although the numbers of slaves never reached those of the South
on large plantations, a few of the manor lords owned a significant
number. On a trip through the Hudson River Valley in the early
1790s, an English visitor remarked that "many of the old Dutch
farmers...have 20 to 30 slaves [and] to their care and management
every thing is left." New York in 1771 had the largest percentage
of slaves in the North, about 10-12% of the population. In that
year, the total population of the Province of New York was 168,007,
of whom 19,873 were slaves. By 1790, the total enslaved population
in New York was over 21,000.
But who were those historically silent ones transported across
the Atlantic on the infamous "Middle Passage," who were chained
in subhuman conditions in the holds of ships and who faced a lifetime
of servitude at their destinations? In the chilling words of one
of the discoverers of the sunken slaver Henrietta Marie,
"One pair of shackles was extremely small, suitable for a child
or perhaps a young woman." The captured were men, women, children
of all ages, and very often whole families. Those who, during
the Middle Passage, died, suffered from disease, or mutinied--in
other words, the economically useless--were thrown overboard.
Although the largest number of enslaved Africans imported into
New York were from Caribbean islands such as Jamaica, Barbados,
St. Christopher, and Antigua, by the middle of the eighteenth
century a significant number were arriving directly from Africa.
The ship Oswego out of Jamaica, upon arrival in New York
in August of 1741, carried a consignment of twelve enslaved Africans
for Philip Livingston. Two later slavers, the Rhode Island
and the Revenge, both sailed directly from Africa in 1749
and 1751 and carried consignments of thirty-eight and fifty-two
African captives respectively for buyers in New York--the latter
for William Beekman.
Along the river wharves in New York and up the Hudson to Albany,
Africans were bought and sold out of taverns and grog houses or
at designated markets. One of the most notorious open-air markets
was along the East River at the end of Wall Street. In Albany
in 1682, an African male was sold for "the sum of 50 good, whole
deliverable beaver skins, but failing of beavers...good, marketable
winter wheat, or peas." Gerard G. Beekman of New York City wished,
in 1748, to purchase "... a young negro wench and child of 9 months.
If she is likely brisk and no bad quality the two will fetch fifty
pounds or more." Cadwallader Colden of New York City and Newburgh
sought to purchase a thirteen-year-old female. "My wife desires
her chiefly to keep the children and to sow...[preferably] one
that appears to be good natured."
In both urban and rural cultures, a division of labor existed
between male and female, although there were chores that both
could do. Women were often cooks, housecleaners, washerwomen,
and nannies for their owners' children, as well as integral producers
of linens and woollens for home consumption and the colonial markets.
Men were waiters, butlers, coachmen, and skilled craftsmen such
as carpenters, masons, and wheelwrights. Children were a vital
link in this work chain. An English visitor to the homes of Chancellor
Robert Livingston and his mother, Margaret Beekman Livingston,
in Dutchess County in the early 1790s observed children at work
alongside adults:
"Four black boys, eldest about 11 or 12, the youngest about 5 or 6 years old, clean and well dressed but barefooted in a livery green turned up with red, waited about the table [during breakfast]...Three black men in livery waited at dinner and the boys before mentioned, their children. It is not unusual for female blacks to wait..."
Preliminary archeological findings from the African Burial Ground
in lower Manhattan show that over one-third of the African population
during the eighteenth century consisted of children under sixteen.
Adulthood for the enslaved was usually defined as beginning at age
ten; after 1746, it was sixteen. In 1712, when the total African
population of New York City was 975, 34% were children; in 1746,
with the African population at 2,610, 44% were children. By 1771,
when the population was 3,137, 36% were children.
One non-labor role that some enslaved children assumed was that
of personal companion to slaveowners' children. An example of this
factotum status is the life of the enslaved African, Caesar, on
the Bethlehem estate of the Rensselaer Nicoll family, eight miles
below Albany. At his death in 1852 at the age of 115, Caesar had
already outlived three masters in that family. He lived longer than
the first to whom he originally belonged; longer than the second
with whom he grew to adulthood; and longer than the third, the son
of the second, to whom he was a constant companion.
Perhaps the most far-reaching legacy of slavery for the African
was the tenuousness of slave families, which at any time, given
the nature of the institution, could be broken up or dissolved.
Cadwallader Colden did exactly that in 1717. In a letter to a friend
on the island of Barbados to whom he sent slaves, Colden wrote:
"I send by this vessel, the Mary Sloope, Capt. Edward Harely Commander, a Negro woman and child...she is a good house negro...Were it not for her allusive tongue, her sullenness...I would not have parted with her...I have several of her children I value and I know if she would stay in this country she would spoil them."
Since slavery was a
violent act, and as long as one race held another in bondage against
its consent, the institution remained highly volatile. Thus interpersonal
relations between masters and slaves were unpredictable. One area
where the differences remained constant and obvious between masters
and their slaves was in the legal relationship of slave parents
and their progeny. On the Livingston Manor in upper Dutchess County,
a tenant farmer, John Dykeman, was murdered in 1715 by his slave,
Ben. Coming in the aftermath of the Negro Rebellion of 1712, the
act was first thought to be part of another such uprising. But
after a preliminary hearing conducted by Robert Livingston, Sr.
and some county magistrates, it was determined that the murder
was the sole act of a heartbroken, vengeful father: Dykeman had
sold Ben's daughter off the manor to one of Livingston's kin in
New York City.
The actions of Ben and of others like him were part of a continuum
of African resistance to slavery. Such resistance was fueled in
the eighteenth century by the enactment of New York's slave code,
the Duke's Laws, first published in 1664 and amended periodically
beginning in 1674. These laws were a British attempt to undo,
or at least undermine, an air of liberalism that the British felt
existed in the colonies and that carried with it an enslaved status
of "half-free," at least under Dutch rule. Such laws moved to
tighten the parameters of slavery, making an African/black-skinned
individual synonymous with a slave. A repercussion seems to have
been the Negro Rebellion of 1712, followed by the Negro Plot of
1741 and the Kingston Conspiracy of 1775, all trying to enable
African freedom and end the nightmare of slavery.
According to Herbert Aptheker, the author of American Negro
Slave Revolts, "Discontent and rebelliousness were not only
exceedingly common, but, indeed, characteristic of American Negro
slaves." In the English colony of New York, this was the driving
force behind many Africans who participated in the American Revolution.
Their bondage would end, they thought, with victory over the British.
But it would not be until July 4, 1827, when New York's emancipation
legislation took effect, that the non-participants, and those
who were re-enslaved, would gain their freedom.
For New Yorkers to truly confront the legacy of slavery, we must
take "the psychological and spiritual journey...back into the
past in order to move forward," as historian Tom Feelings writes,
by reexamining slavery as an integral part of New York's history.
If we can do this, says writer Rosemarie Robotham, "...we may
at last move beyond terrors and the angry racial conceptions that
divide us, toward the deeper connections that can render us whole...".
Tamika McMillan and Maribel Cordero, interns with the New York
State Freedom Trail Project and graduate students at the University
at Albany, assisted Professor Williams-Myers with the research
for this article.

